|


[~][`] |
Introduction to a new series of publications on
Reformed Mission History by Reformation Media & Press

This is the seal of the Massachusetts (or Salem) Colony.
Seal translation: Seal of the Governor and Colony of the Massachusetts Bay
in New England. (Nehemiah Adams, The Life of John Elliot: with an
Account of the Early Missionary Efforts among the Indians of New England
[Massachusetts Sabbath School Society, Boston, 1847 p.6])
Books in this series
First publication
For the Cause of the Son of God:
The Missionary Significance of the Belgic Confession
by Dr. Wesley L. Bredenhof.
ISBN 9 780977 344253 Now available in print & PDF Ebook versions
Click here for more information.
Second publication
The Reformed Church and its Mission in Dutch
Brazil (1630-1654) by Dr. Frans L. Schalkwijk. (Expected late 2011)
Third publication
Mission in Chains --
The life, theology and ministry of the ex-slave Jacobus E. J. Capitein (1717-1747)
with a translation of his major publications (including a defense of slavery)
by Dr. David Nii Anum Kpobi. (Expected early 2012.)
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Series Preface to Reformed Mission
History Series of publications by Reformation Media & Press
The impression is often given that strong
support for the missionary cause has never really come from those who hold to
Reformed convictions. Writers such
as Kenneth Scott Latourette and Stephen Neill have minimized or neglected the
contributions of Reformed figures in the history of Christian mission.
Sometimes explanations are offered as to why the Reformation produced no
missionary fervour. These
explanations range from the theological (“Calvinism kills missionary
motivation”) to the political (“Their governments would have prevented them from
being engaged in missionary endeavours”).
Our contention is that these explanations are at least unnecessary
because the phenomenon itself does not exist.
It is simply not true that the Reformation had nothing or little to do
with mission.[1]
Neither is it true that the descendants of
the Reformation cared little or nothing about missionary outreach.
This volume is one of a series of mission
histories and biographies entitled “Reformed Mission History.”
This series will demonstrate that the Reformation was a missionary
movement. We endeavour to put to
rest the notion that the Reformation and its heirs disregarded those who are
lost, whether at home or abroad. We
want to show how there was a missionary emphasis from the beginning of the
Reformation. This emphasis was found
with its leaders and their actions and writings, and especially in the Reformed
(including Presbyterian and other) confessions.
Our focus in this series is on what is commonly called the “Calvinistic
side” of the Reformation.
But long before Calvin was born, the seeds
were being sown. Genuinely Christian
missionary efforts were undertaken and bore fruit.
For long centuries Europe lay under medieval spiritual darkness.
While Christian in name, the vast majority had been deprived of the
gospel and the Christ who saves.
Around 1400, John Wycliffe’s ‘poor preachers’ were missionaries to England and
lowland Scotland. The followers of
John Huss (1372-1415) and Jerome of Prague (1370-1416) performed the same work
in central Europe, often paying the price with their blood.
These “morning stars of the Reformation” already saw their work in
missionary terms. With the
appearance of Luther, Melanchthon, Zwingli, Farel, Calvin, and others, the true
gospel began going out with increased vigour to the nations of Europe.
John Calvin’s relationship to mission has
received some attention in the last century or so.[2]
Despite the claims of some, Calvin insisted
that the church has an abiding call to bring the gospel to the nations.[3]
In his extant congregational
prayers, one can hear Calvin praying for the gospel to go out to those who are
lost.[4]
One of the key things to
recognize about Calvin’s theology of mission is that he sees the objects of
mission in broader terms than many would today.
This was true of all sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Reformed
believers. For Calvin, Europe under
the sway of Roman Catholicism was essentially pagan, or at least sub-Christian.
From his standpoint, the lost were certainly in far-off lands overseas.
However, they were also close to home, wherever people still consistently
held to Roman Catholic beliefs and practices.
This led Fred Klooster to comment some years ago that the Reformation
“deserves to be called one of the greatest home missionary projects in all
history.”[5]
The comment is anachronistic
insofar as the Reformers themselves made no distinction between local evangelism
and foreign mission. Calvin and
other Reformers saw all gospel outreach as mission, whether local or otherwise,
whether within a culture or cross-cultural.
That leads us to note that Calvin was not
only a theorizer or theologian of mission, he was also a man of action.
The Genevan academy under his leadership was recognized as a missionary
training center. The missionaries in
training there were mostly being equipped for ministry in Roman Catholic Europe.
During Calvin’s lifetime, at his direction, and having received his
instruction, literally hundreds of men were sent out from Geneva to preach the
biblical gospel to the lost and confused.
Furthermore, Calvin also had an
eye for the lost abroad. In 1556,
the Genevan church sent out two missionaries with a group of French Huguenots
hoping to start a colony in Brazil.[6]
Arriving in March of 1557, they began working
among the Tupinambas, an indigenous people.
Unfortunately, this work was sabotaged when the leader of the colony
apostatized back to Roman Catholicism.
Three of the Huguenots were martyred for their faith, not by the
Tupinambas, but by their fellow Frenchmen.
It was a tragic outcome, but the entire event testifies that Reformed
churches of the sixteenth century were concerned about what many today would
call foreign mission.
Much more could be said about the first
generations of Reformers. For
instance, there were the successful efforts of William Farel and Anthony Saucier
to bring the Waldensian movement into greater conformity with the biblical
gospel.[7]
Martin Bucer has been described as a “father
of Reformed mission.”[8]
His writings are full of
evidence of missionary fervour.
Guido (or Guy) de Brčs is another figure to whom we could draw your attention.
The author of the Belgic Confession never went overseas to Brazil or any
non-European nation, yet he regarded his work as missionary nonetheless.
The Roman Catholics among whom he was evangelizing were not distant
brothers in the Lord, but those who were lost in darkness and apart from Jesus
Christ. In fact, the Belgic
Confession may be considered as a missionary witness to a lost world.[9]
While this emphasis was present with the
first two generations of Reformers, it only grew stronger with the coming
generations. The first Protestant
with a detailed theology of mission was Gisbertus Voetius (1589-1676).
Voetius taught at Utrecht in the Netherlands and was zealous for the
missionary cause at home and overseas.[10]
In Voetius’ day, the Reformed Church in the
Netherlands was actively involved in missionary work in present-day Indonesia,
Taiwan, Sri Lanka, Brazil, and the north-eastern United States.[11]
Later on, missionary work was
also undertaken in present-day South Africa.
The church sent out ministers to these places with the dual task of
pastoring colonialists and discipling native peoples.
This all took place in the context of cooperative arrangements between
the Reformed church and the Dutch East and West India Companies.
While the arrangement was less than ideal, it does reflect an ongoing
missionary consciousness amongst Reformed believers in the seventeenth century.
This was not only taking place on
the European continent. Those with
Reformed convictions in the British isles were also reflecting on Christian
mission and participating in it.
Already in 1560, the Scots Confession evidenced missionary awareness when
it bore on its title page the words of Christ in Matthew 24:14, “And this glad
tidings of the Kingdom shall be preached through the whole world for a witness
to all nations; and then shall the end come.”
With the advent of the Reformation, the church in Scotland dedicated its
energies to the great task of evangelizing the northern reaches of Britain.[12]
This
was the church taking its missionary calling seriously.
The seventeenth century saw further
developments in the British isles and their colonies.
The classic work in this regard is still Sidney Rooy’s
The Theology of Missions in the Puritan
Tradition.[13]
Rooy researched some English Puritans and
concluded that mission theology and practice was alive and well in this period.
Richard Sibbes, for instance, stressed the communicative nature of faith,
recapitulating an emphasis from the sixteenth-century Reformation.
Richard Baxter was more practically oriented in his development of
mission principles, especially in his discussions of the role of the church.
John Eliot famously put mission principles into practice in his labours
among the native inhabitants of New England.
Cotton Mather stressed how the missionary cause could be furthered
through printed literature. And then
there was Jonathan Edwards. He too
not only wrote about mission theology, but also served as a missionary in
colonial New England. These were but
representative figures – not the exception, but the norm.
Rooy’s study is important for it reveals that Puritan Calvinism, growing
out of the Reformation, held to a “theology of redemption for the world.”[14]
This theology went on to bear
fruit at home and overseas and laid the foundations upon which others, such as
Zinzendorf and Carey later built.
A moment ago we mentioned the
cooperative arrangement between the Dutch Reformed Church and the trade
companies. The Church of England
sought a similar arrangement with the British West and East India Companies.[15]
However, due to concerns over the stability
of economic opportunities, the Companies were reluctant.
Where missionary work was permitted, it was only under stringent
restrictions. Nevertheless,
oftentimes dedicated chaplains and ministers accompanying colonists worked
“under the radar” to reach out to local indigenous communities.
It took until the nineteenth century for allowances to be made for legal
outreach in places like India.
We might also mention the early history of
the colonies in what is today the United States.
The Mayflower Compact stated the purpose of the new colony being
established. It was to be “for the
glory of God and advancement of the Christian faith.”
The advancement of the faith was why men like John Eliot came to the new
world and established mission efforts among indigenous Americans.
The original seal of the Colony of Massachusetts Bay portrayed a Native
American with these words proceeding from his mouth, “Come over and help us.”
This reveals that the colony regarded themselves as foreign missionaries
to North America.
This was also the case with their
brethren in the Plymouth Colony, who had arrived eight years previous.
Before they had departed from the Netherlands, Governor Bradford had
spoken of their motivations. Among
them were: “From an inward zeal and great hope of laying some foundation or
making way for propagating the kingdom of Christ to the remote ends of the
earth, though they should be but as stepping stones to others.”[16]
Many others could be
mentioned. Basically, by the time
William Carey arrived on the scene, Reformed, Presbyterian, and Congregational
Calvinistic churches had already been serious about mission since the
Reformation. Not only was there
missionary action, there had also been serious missiological reflection.
To be sure, there were inconsistencies and there were lulls, but no one
who has done meaningful research can claim that Protestant missions effectively
began with Carey, or perhaps slightly earlier, the Moravian Zinzendorf.
We do not deny that Carey’s work introduced a new era in the history of
mission. His context was
characteristically lackadaisical when it came to mission.
Yet this was not because of any inherent defect in Protestantism, nor
because of the Calvinistic convictions held by Carey or others.
Our goal in this
series is to revive interest in the great history of Reformed mission.
We aim to bring God glory with what he has done through great men and
events of the past. Moreover, we
endeavour to demonstrate that orthodox Reformed convictions are not merely
compatible with missionary zeal; in fact, such convictions inevitably must
result in such zeal. In fact, the
evidence demonstrates that William Carey and others caught the age-old biblical
vision from their Reformed forebears and heard the call to mission and the rest,
as they say, is history. Those
gripped by the doctrines of grace and the beauty of the gospel as best expressed
in Reformed theology, cannot but be passionate about bringing the good news of
Jesus Christ to those yet in darkness.
Dr. Wesley
Bredenhof, Dr. Stephen Westcott & Rev. Geoffrey Donnan
[1]
We use the singular "mission" advisedly since there is one mission given
by Jesus Christ to the church in such passages as Matthew 28:18-20.
However, we do recognize a justifiable common parlance in which churches
and missionaries speak about their mission in several ways: 1)
their particular work of missions as a more specific application of the
overall mission given to the church by Jesus Christ, and 2) the
organizational structure under whose auspices they do their work, be it
under a church committee or some “para-church” organization which
oversees or supervises their work. In that manner of speaking one
could speak of "missions" in the plural.
[2]
See “John Calvin and Missions,” Wes Bredenhof, Christian Renewal 27:11
(February 25, 2009), 24-27; “Calvijn en de Zending,” J. VanderLinden,
De Reformatie 17:46 (August
13, 1937), 376-377; “The
Missionary Dynamic in the Theology of John Calvin,” Charles Chaney,
The Reformed Review 17.3
(March, 1964), 24-38; “The Reformers and Missions,” S.H. Rooy, in
Signposts of God’s Liberating Kingdom:
Perspectives for the 21st Century (Vol.2)
(Potchefstroom:
Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir Christelike Hoër Onderwys, 1998),
187-224; “Calvin’s Evangelism,” Joel Beeke,
Mid-America Journal of Theology
15 (2004), 67-86; “John Calvin in Mission Literature,” James DeJong,
Pro Rege 4.1 (September 1975),
6-17.
[3]
See
Commentary on a Harmony of the
Evangelists, John Calvin (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1984), 383-384;
Commentary on Isaiah, John Calvin (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1984),
402-403.
[4]
Tracts and Treatises Vol. 2:
The Doctrine and Worship of the Church,
John Calvin (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1958), 102.
[5]
“Missions – the Heidelberg Catechism and Calvin,” Fred H. Klooster,
Calvin Theological Journal 7.2
(November 1972), 187.
[6]
For fuller accounts, see Beeke,
op.cit., 79-82 and Fulfil Your
Ministry, K. Deddens (Winnipeg: Premier, 1990), 158-160
[7]
You Are My Witnesses—The
Waldensians across 800 years,
Giorgio Tourn et al. (Torino: Claudiana Editrice, 1989), 69-73.
[8]
Reformatie en zending, Bucer en
Walaeus: vaders van reformatorische zending, L. J. Joosse (Goes:
Oosterbaan & Le Cointre B.V., 1988).
[9]
For the Cause of the Son of God:
the Missionary Significance of the Belgic Confession, Wes Bredenhof
(Fellsmere: Reformation Media and Press, 2011).
[10]
See “The Missiology of Gisbertus Voetius: the First Comprehensive
Protestant Theology of Missions,” Jan Jongeneel,
Calvin Theological Journal 26:1 (April 1991): 47-79;
De zendingsleer van Gisbertus
Voetius, H. A. Van Andel (Kampen: J. H. Kok, 1912).
[11]
On Brazil, see The Reformed Church
and her Mission in Dutch Brazil (1630-1654), Frans Schalkwijk (Fellsmere:
Reformation Media and Press, 2011); also see
Mission in Chains, David Kpobi (Fellsmere: Reformation Media and
Press, 2011).
[12]
The Missionary Ideal in the
Scottish Churches, D. Mackichan (London: Hodder and Stoughton
Publishers, 1927), 64-65.
[13]
The Theology of Missions in the
Puritan Tradition: A Study of Representative Puritans: Richard Sibbes,
Richard Baxter, John Eliot, Cotton Mather, and Jonathan Edwards,
Sidney H. Rooy (Delft: W.D. Meinema, 1965).
[14]
The Theology of Missions, 11.
[15]
Robert Boyle (1627-1691), a
Protestant Irishman, was perhaps one of the leading lights under some
influence from the Puritans.
He was one of the directors of the British East India Company.
Desiring to spread Christianity throughout the East, he made
large donations made from his estate (acquired during Cromwell’s
conquest in the Irish war (1649-1653) for the establishment of many
missionary societies.
[16]
The Life of John Eliot: with an
Account of the Early Missionary Efforts among the Indians of New England,
Nehemiah Adams (Boston: Massachusetts Sabbath School Society, 1847),
6-9.
Top
|
|